Organize in Changing the World Together
Are you tired of Slack and Facebook? Have a discussion space like Mighty Networks but no one comes? Want to support network weaving or self-organizing, but the tools fail you?
Then join June Holley and Ari Sahagún on September 8th to explore and help co-design Acter, a platform specifically designed for and with networks (and networks of networks) working on social change. During the session you will have a chance to learn basic network weaving strategies that make online spaces come alive. During the coming months you will have several opportunities to co-design new features of Acter, while trying out network weaving practices -- all at no cost to you.
We know that a tool alone won’t be able to get the job done of network weaving - that’s why we’re pairing practice sessions on weaving and self-organizing with a tool built to learn how to support these person-to-person interactions. We want to enable more and better relationships within networks - for collaboration, sharing thought partnership, and just getting to know each other.
We want to invite you to learn about online network weaving while co-creating a useful space for exactly that. On September 8 (8 am pst, 12 pm eastern, 6 pm cet) we’re offering a one hour interactive exploration of the platform where you can complete a profile, connect to others with similar interests and set up a group space around a topic you’re interested in.
You will get a chance to meet and work with June Holley, network weaver, and Ari Sahagún, movement network ecologist as well as Emil Vincentz and Janne Winther from Acter.
Please sign up for the event through calendly HERE.
Acter can help you find others interested in some of the same things you care about, then easily set up a group space where you can invite others to join. In the next two months, we will be asking you to co-design these learning and work spaces so they meet your network’s needs. We will also be inviting you to help Acter develop an expanded list of ”hot topics” so you can better find other people through maps showing connections among people interested in that topic.
“At long last, a platform designed just for networks and networks of networks! I have been working with the talented acter.global team now for months and I am impressed.”
June Holley
If you want to know more about Acter you can watch our short introduction video below:
A slide show with even more detail is HERE.
We are a tech startup based in Aarhus, Denmark. We are working for purpose and impact, not profit. Any profit we make we reinvest in accordance with the four Cs - company, co-workers, customers, and community. We have a diverse team of people, some are entrepreneurs, researchers, chaos pilots, software engineers, students, artists, activists. We are a relatively young team working to make digital tools assets in creating a regenerative world.
Acter is already working with ReGeneration 2030, DANUBE Youth Network, United Nations Youth Association, Aarhus Municipality among others.
In addition to co-designers, Acter is looking for partners/funders, who are willing to help underwrite the cost of continued development.
Also, if you might be interested in developing a customized site for your grantees or networks, please contact Emil Vincentz at emil@acter.global.
Comparison Chart
Features | Mighty Networks | Slack | Acter.global |
---|---|---|---|
Platform participants are involved in co-designing the site | No | No | Yes |
People’s profiles help them find others interested in learning or working on a similar topic | Profiles not flexible or useful | No useful profile system | Profiles already have focus, approach and hashtags as part of profiles *Working on more (and you can help co-design) detailed profiling around mutual exchange of skill building, hot topics, etc |
Profiles are used to create network maps | No | No | In development: working on instant network maps (both geographic and interest clusters identified by profiles, maybe emerging themes in the future) |
Support for collaborative projects | Minimal | Confusing | Easy to move from cluster to workspace for projects; workspace will soon have links to google docs, zoom, library |
People can join as part of an organization and part of multiple networks as well as individual | Doesn’t have this capacity | Does not have | Currently being developed |
Network Weaving training and practice groups are integrated into the site | No | No | Currently being developed; will be available to the Intro Group |
Create and share activities across multiple groups and networks | No | No | Currently being developed |
Connect across multiple groups, organisations and networks | No | No | Currently being developed |
Provide all participants with a set of metrics about the site | Only admin | No | Currently being developed |
Please sign up for the event through calendly HERE.
PLEASE DONATE to help Network Weaver continue in it’s mission to offer free support and resources to networks worldwide.
Who Decides Who Decides?
Have you ever started a group that started with enthusiasm and fizzled out over time? I have. Even more often, I have joined groups that other people started… that fizzled out over time.
So, what happened? If your experiences are similar to mine, here are some typical stories.
- Groups start out with a vague understanding of what we’d do together and then we don’t do things because first we talk… and talk about what we would do if we ever actually started. Needless to say, we don’t start but fade away.
- Someone starts doing things. Somehow the doers take over and there’s no room to plug in. We’re all grateful but there’s also no room to talk about whether what they’re doing fits with the rest.
Self-organization is powerful because it has the potential to align a lot of people and their passion with each other. Yet, self-organization doesn’t mean having “no rules”.
The invisible force that makes or breaks a new group is governance. Governance doesn’t sound exciting, and it reminds everyone of boring board room meetings. Yet, the truth is that governance is everywhere - every group that makes decisions gets to those decisions somehow - whether we like that way of making decisions or not.
So how can we introduce just enough clarity and process to make governance inclusive, easy and unleash the power of self-organization? There’s a new book that describes exactly that. It uses the tools from sociocracy - a consent-based, heavily participatory, and co-creative decentralized governance system - and lays out how to start a group and put decision-making and a good distribution of responsibility and actions into place step by step. The book has printable meeting templates of the first 3 meetings that will support your new group and launch it well!
- In the first meeting, a group establishes how they operate and what they do. They celebrate being a group and spend time getting to know each other.
- In meeting #2, a little bit of structure is established so everyone knows how to contribute, and the group can plan for the future in an accountable way.
- Meeting #3 is all about getting started and reviewing what we’ve done so far - only if we review our processes can we make sure everyone’s needs are considered and we are intentional about how we spend our time.
The process works the best for groups of 3-12 people who are actively involved. It can be used to start or to re-kindle a group.
The book comes with a resource page of printables, demo videos and an interactive forum.
Ted Rau is a trainer, consultant and co-founder of the non-profit movement support organization Sociocracy For All.
He grew up in suburban Germany and studied linguistics, literature and history in Tübingen before earning his PhD in linguistics there in 2010. As part of that career, he moved to the USA and fulfilled a long-held wish to live in an intentional community. Since a career in Academia required more moving around than he was willing to do, he left Academia. Ted identifies as a transgender man, and he is a parent of 5 children. He lives with 70 neighbors in Massachusetts in an intentional community. Link to more info on sociocracy
PLEASE DONATE to help Network Weaver continue in it’s mission to offer free support and resources to networks worldwide.
Organizing Liberatory Networks: An Invitation
These are emerging reflections on the work we have done within networks, which includes networks for and led by people of color, multi-racial networks, queer networks, immigrant networks, and other groups that have come together to shift systems towards equity and liberation. In particular, we want to name the leadership of Black and Indigenous women and femmes within these networks who contribute wisdom and emotional labor to support the work of these groups. We are also grateful for the wisdom shared by The Queen Sages, Child Care for Every Family, Protecting Immigrant Families, All Above All, Transformative Leadership for Change, Center for Innovation in Worker Organization and their Women Innovating Labor Leadership Program, and all the participants of the movement network organizer pilot.
The events of the last year, continuing to this year, have called on us to deepen practices that center intersectionality, solidarity, racial justice, and mutual aid. Organizers have been working one-on-one with people in communities and side-by-side with other organizations to support people’s immediate needs and build movements for love, dignity, and justice. Along the way, organizers have deepened their praxis on transformational organizing and working in networked ways. (We think of praxis as having a stance of discovery and learning as we experiment with and embody aligning our values, beliefs, and worldviews with our practices, mindsets, and ways of being.)
This blog shares what we are learning from organizers and grassroots groups about organizing with and in networks. These insights are constantly evolving and changing so we invite organizers, networks, capacity builders, and those who fund this work to learn, practice, and deepen our learning together on how to catalyze and shape liberatory networks. We are in a moment of possibility where we can hold the learnings from the last year(s) and continue to build, nourish, and sustain networks that disrupt conditions in the sector to advance love, dignity, and justice.
What Are Liberatory Networks?
Over the last decade, we’ve learned a lot about how to nurture and sustain powerful, equitable networks (by network we mean collective efforts that seek to align people across constituencies, geographies, issues, or movements to accomplish something no individual entity could do alone). Allen Kwabena Frimpong at AdAstra Collective has introduced us to different types of networks such as the decentralized, self-organized network with many overlapping clusters and a strong periphery. Folks like Deepa Iyer and June Holley have helped us to understand the roles individuals play within networks and movements, such as “the guardian” who creates the conditions for the network to thrive, or “the healer” who mends harm within it. Finally, organizers have helped us understand the essential capacities networks need to be sustainable and advance equity, such as weaving relationships that center equity and trust or managing polarities, conflict, and the distribution of power and resources.
As working in networked ways becomes the norm, we are seeing professionalization, technocratization, and the loss of the relational soul of many of our networks. Thus, we want to elevate what we are learning from folks of color and queer folks who have been catalyzing, co-creating, and evolving networks that embody transformation at the personal, organizational, and network levels. These networks are interdependent, relational, evolving ecosystems where we can be our whole selves, be mutually supportive and accountable, and co-create new futures—where both what we are doing together and how we are doing it are important and integral. In order to distinguish the work of these groups from conventional networks, we refer to them as “liberatory networks.”
Liberatory networks create space for long-term visioning, self-awareness, naming and addressing the oppression that is replicated in our strategies, and the healing of personal suffering. They support individuals to ground in their ancestral and spiritual roots. They have mechanisms to hold people through traumas, triggers, harm, and internalized oppression in ways that restore relationships and connection. Member organizations are actively doing anti-racism/oppression work internally to show up in solidarity with others and in accountability with community, staff, and board.
These powerful networks are disrupting what we have been taught, and now assume, about what strong leadership and operations should look like in the nonprofit sector. Many networks and organizations are moving from solo charismatic leaders to shared leadership, from “power over” to co-powering, from top-down knowing to collective meaning-making, from defaulting to habits of white supremacy culture to practices centering BIPOC leaders and advancing the collective liberation of all people. Through these practices, liberatory networks, in turn, enable us to advance equitable systems change and shift culture overall.
Invitation to Intentional Praxis
As Stacey Abrams points out, now is the time to build the infrastructure we need to have the power to bring forth our most radical imaginations for a new society. This infrastructure will be and already is networked with clusters of organizations and individuals that are interconnected. One organization or short-term coalition cannot meet growing community needs or support healing from trauma; cannot absorb, sustain, or deepen the engagement of millions of people who want to participate; and often cannot transform society. Liberatory networks allow us to build, aggregate, and wield more power. They can provide a space to reconnect and heal from racialized harm, isolation, burnout, competition, fragmentation, and campaign-to-campaign exhaustion. They can enable us to collectively deepen our praxis towards liberation.
Organizers are important bridgers both across and within liberatory networks. When organizers have space to work with community and network members, they can co-create liberated, powerful, and creative spaces that inform and shape liberatory networks. When included in developing bold visions and strategies at the network level, organizers bring these ideas into relationships and action on the ground.
Organizers are already drawing connections within their work and learning about and co-creating liberatory networks through their own experimentation. At the same time, organizers and other network members, such as capacity builders, facilitators, and funders, could be stronger partners and architects in building and nurturing the infrastructure we need for a liberated future if there were more spaces for intentional praxis and broader sharing of these learnings across – in addition to within – networks.
What We Are Learning About Organizing Liberatory Networks
The following are praxis seeds for organizing in networked ways to advance liberation. We draw on stories shared through two pilot classes co-authors Susan, Trish, and Robin did with 29 organizers, a convening we did with grassroots leaders and funders, and our own experiences partnering with organizing groups and networks. We invite you to contribute your own insights as well so that we can continue a dialogue about organizing liberated networks. What is your praxis? How can we continue to evolve our practices to get closer to our aspirations of liberation and racial justice?
1. Centering racial equity and healing, particularly addressing and repairing inequitable distribution of power, resources, and labor
When working in and across networks, organizers are being thoughtful and transparent about how to marshall resources, recognition, and capacity equitably given current and historic racism and intersecting oppressions. Organizers spoke to three ways that they are doing this. First, several organizers shared how they use somatic practices and storytelling to support BIPOC members to develop a racial analysis, connect to ancestral wisdom, and embody what it means to center themselves. As one example, an organizer described this somatic stance: “I have my hands out; I’m open. I have one foot forward and one foot back; as a male Latino, I’m listening to women and courageously taking space against patriarchy.” Second, when individuals are grounded in their whole selves, organizers can facilitate conversations about the differences among groups. One person, for instance, shared how white and BIPOC caucuses helped develop radical relationships across racial groups. Lastly, organizers in networks are addressing inequitable distributions of labor, resources, credit, and compensation. Women of color and Black women and femmes, in particular, often hold emotional labor and relational work in networks. Participants at the NEST1 convening discussed ways to shift this dynamic by compensating women for this invisible labor, sharing or shifting responsibilities to white men, and prioritizing regional tables that center leaders of color.
Opportunities for Praxis Exploration
- Centering people of color, blackness, and indigenous peoples while de-centering whiteness
- Building a foundation of trust to recognize power differences and have courageous conversations
- Embodying love, human dignity, and compassion
- Unpacking levels of oppression while recognizing the historic social construction of racism
- Moving from oppression to liberation by reconnecting to source, story, body, and emotions (thanks to Monica Dennis for this framework)
- Attending to who does the emotional labor and how we share that or rectify it
- Managing the tensions between addressing immediate needs of communities of color and laying long-term foundations for transformation
- Reflecting on where our movements have failed to embody our values and consciously co-create the conditions for embodying them moving forward
- Centering reflection, learning, repair and re-creation as a continuous and loving process.
2. Doing the inner work needed for personal and interpersonal transformation, which is critical for nurturing radical relationships and our interdependence
There are two areas of inner work that are top of mind for organizers working in networked ways. The first area is nurturing radical relationships and connections within and across movements. Two of the organizers we work with shared that, when they had the opportunity to develop a shared political analysis and vision with a people of color caucus over the course of a two-day retreat before collaborating with the broader network, it enabled them to nurture trust, recognize shared values, and find ways to honor each person’s and organization’s contribution to the movement. Another organizer shared how they connected two groups that would not normally be allies by asking a powerful question: “What does home mean for you?” This question later led to a storytelling organizing process across multiple organizations, supporting both individual and group transformation.
The second area is embracing generative tensions as a liberatory practice. These tensions are often framed as polarities and include abundance and scarcity, conflict avoidance or expression, centralization or decentralization, focusing nationally or statewide, transparency and information overload, accountability for racialized harm and cancel culture, calling partners into a radical stance or compromising for an interim win, and so many more. Organizers regularly navigate these tensions as their context continuously evolves. This involves reframing disagreement from being divisive to being generative. Navigating tensions can deepen our collective capacity to make meaning of complex issues. It can help groups discern when our desire for resolution is rooted in our discomfort with holding multiple and different ideas (so we could get more comfortable living with conflict) and when this desire is needed to maintain the integrity of the network. Organizers further shared that they use racial healing, restorative justice, conflict resolution, polarity management, forward stance, and many other approaches to name and reconcile tensions and realign and heal networks and relationships.
Opportunities for Praxis Exploration
- Integrating head, heart, and body
- Embracing change and emergence
- Nurturing a whole person and their ways of being
- Creating space for relationship building
- Recognizing difference, naming tensions and polarities, reconciling conflict generatively, and healing harm
- Tending to well-being and sacred grounding
- Supporting self and community care
3. Shifting to more emergent and collective ways of understanding and navigating complex systems change
Organizers regularly engage community and network members to analyze systemic root causes and identify leverage points for transformation. They use a range of practices like storytelling circles and collective vision murals to do so. During the pandemic, organizers became pros at adaptation – moving to digital organizing, virtual policy advocacy, and mutual aid to address emerging community needs. They built in check-ins, yoga, breathwork, meditation, and other practices to support themselves and community members to be resilient. Organizers are always adapting as they seek complex systems change including:
- Tending to both campaigns and the sustainability of people, organizations, and the network overall
- Figuring out when all network members need to be in agreement and when a critical mass of a network can move things forward
- Having ways for parts of a network to opt in or out of democratic processes
- Flexing between decentralized experiments with liberated models and coordinated targeted campaigns
NEST convening participants also shared how networks are themselves systems, and people need well-resourced spaces to disrupt white supremacy, model liberatory ways of being with each other, and translate learnings from successes and failures without judgment.
Opportunities for Praxis Exploration
- Forging interconnectedness and interdependence and breaking silos
- Shifting from scarcity to abundance
- Embracing change and emergence while letting go of certainty and the idea that healthy networks are static
- Developing a complexity mindset, which means assuming disagreement, unpredictability, ambiguity, and emergent patterns
- Listening deeply, holding multiple perspectives (i.e., individual, organization, and network), and generating nuanced alternatives
- Experimenting as a way to take risks, innovate, and learn
4. Sharing leadership and decision-making power in ways that lift up Black and Indigenous peoples and other people who have historically been excluded from power
Sharing leadership is core to transformative organizing in networks. What this means for organizers is supporting community members to recognize and develop their own leadership, and centering Black, Indigenous, and other people of color in leadership (both of which are critical in non-network contexts as well). For instance, women of color organizers Trish Tchume and Aida Cuadrado Bozzo have worked with groups of organizers to navigate complexity and emergence (which are typical for networks), in support of a shared vision, build teams that are intentional about staying in “right relationship,” and call in community members to a liberatory stance.
Sharing leadership and power also means creating transparent feedback loops, opportunities for community members to practice different leadership roles within a network, and spaces to collectively connect to heart, body, and spirit. For instance, one organizer shared how they used salsa dancing to invite people to show up as their full self and see the different roles in a movement (e.g., lead, follower, creating space, etc.). As another example, organizers are engaging community members (who are compensated for their time), to gather community perspectives, stories, and experiences; shape priorities of the network itself; review messaging, materials, and tools that are used with community members; and co-develop actions on shared campaign tactics.
Opportunities for Praxis Exploration
- Recentering BIPOC leadership, particularly as decision-makers and liberated gatekeepers
- Cultivating not one leader but many leaders who can trade-off and play different roles
- Engaging and developing leadership at many points and levels of authority in the system
- Systems and processes for shared meaning making, co-creation, and mutual accountability
- Connect to self as a whole person and developing trusting relationships with others
- Sharing decision-making power, credit, resources, influence, and turf with attention to liberation, equity, and reparations
- Collectively determining how funding will be raised, used, and distributed in the network
5. Creating space to connect to our multiple wisdoms and intelligences (e.g., ancestral, spiritual, natural, creative, somatic, etc.)
Some organizers have long histories of connecting community and network members to multiple wisdoms and intelligences (e.g., theater of the oppressed as a somatic and artistic practice for political education). Other organizers spoke to how challenging it is to shift organizing patterns to make space for spirituality, emotions, artistic and experiential practices, and bodywork. Many organizers strive to hold themselves, partners, and community members as whole people in their full dignity, which means supporting people to develop their innate talents, decolonize, heal, and express themselves in the ways that make sense for themselves. This is critical to transformational organizing and to organizing liberated networks. Trish Tchume and Aida Cuadrado Bozzo, with Viveka Chen, Zuri Tau, Holiday Simmons, and Susan Wilcox, have developed “Calling In & Up: A Leadership Pedagogy for Women of Color Organizers,” which supports organizers in creating liberated spaces that embrace multiple wisdoms. The guide shares a range of spiritual, cultural, and somatic practices to decolonize spaces, create the conditions to live into liberation, and build and deepen relationships.
Opportunities for Praxis Exploration
- Recognizing, lifting up, and engaging wisdom in multiple forms including experiential, ancestral, spiritual, natural, somatic, art and culturally-based forms of expression and meaning-making
- Embracing being a co-learner and co-creator rather than or in addition to being an expert
- Rooting into a values-based frame
- Shifting approaches to organizing that disproportionately value analytical, intellectual, and logical forms of knowing
An Offering for Praxis
This blog shares what we’ve been learning from organizers and grassroots groups about organizing liberatory networks. We invite you to share your learning, insights, and questions so that we can continue a dialogue about organizing liberatory networks together.
How are your networks embodying liberatory network approaches?
Please share your reflections in the comments below!
1The Networks for Equitable Systems Transformation (NEST) convening took place across 2.5 days in 2019. The group consisted of network funders, participants, and intermediaries who shared space and surfaced challenges, opportunities, and questions related to their work in networks. Read more about the design of the NEST convening and key takeaways from participants here.
2Here we are not referring to an organization’s membership base since not all organizations have a membership model although there can be overlap when community members are also members of an organization.
We'd like to thank Panta Rhea for supporting the movement network organizer pilot and our efforts to share this learning with you through this blog.
About the Authors
Susan Misra’s life purpose is to work with advocates and activists to actualize their visions and values of justice and equity in their relationships, structures, and work today. She has over 20 years of experience in developing equitable, sustainable organizations and networks for movement building.
Trish Tchume is the Leadership Program Director for Community Change and comes with almost two decades of experience helping everyday people see their role in the gorgeous project of building a more just and equitable society.
Robin Katcher strengthens organizations, leaders, and networks on the front lines of social change. Her deep experience in social justice movements – as an organizer, educator, legislative advocate, and board member – informs her rigorous approach to building powerful organizations, leaders, and networks.
Natalie Bamdad joined Change Elemental in 2017. She supports Change Elemental consulting engagements through research, analysis, and project management. Her core areas of expertise include strategic planning and program design and implementation.
Natasha Winegar is a researcher, writer, communications specialist, and coach. She joined Change Elemental in 2013, and is our Research & Communications Manager. She collaborates on our consulting, coaching, and learning engagements, bringing a blend of curiosity, imagination, strategic insight, and a commitment to love, dignity, and justice.
Originally published at ChangeElemental.Org
Banner Photo Credit: Cuba Gallery | Flickr
by SUSAN MISRA, TRISH TCHUME, ROBIN KATCHER, NATALIE BAMDAD, NATASHA WINEGAR
5 Strategies for Combining Equity with Sociocracy
The key promise of sociocracy is that all voices matter. In reality our current sociocracy practices are not enough to overcome the way society systemically oppresses the voices of people from poor, non-white, transgender, disabled, et cetera, backgrounds.
Examples of how this dynamic can show up
- Everyone speaks in rounds at a meeting but participants only acknowledge ideas brought up by men
- An all white human resources circle seeks input from organizational members but deprioritizes a Black member’s request to strengthen the organization’s anti-racist policies
- A school leadership circle makes decisions by consent but the circle doesn’t have any student members
In all these examples, people were using sociocratic practices but were not truly listening to everyone. In other words, they were not governing equitably.
In this article I define equity, make an argument for why combining equity and sociocracy is so powerful, and share five strategies for embedding equity into sociocratic governance.
What is equity?
Equity is both an outcome and a process. The outcome is that all people are equipped to thrive as happy, healthy, and impactful citizens of the world regardless of what class, race, gender, caste, abilities, etc. people have. The process is that those most impacted by inequity lead in setting priorities, deciding where to invest resources, and shaping policies. People who have been most oppressed are the ones who best understand the problems and therefore best understand how to break down systems of oppression for the benefit of everyone’s collective liberation.
Equity is different from equality because equality has often been used to describe giving everyone the same opportunities or the same support, but what is equal is not always fair. A child growing up poor, for example, will need a lot more financial resources from the community than a child who’s growing up rich.
Why combine equity with sociocracy?
When we combine equity with sociocracy, we create a powerful tool for change.
One, combining equity with sociocracy makes it possible to fulfill sociocracy’s promise of all voices matter.
Two, I’ve found that social movements and organizations often struggle because more common governance frameworks such as majority rules or unclear consensus processes are inherently inequitable.
So while sociocracy alone is not enough to overcome centuries of oppression, it does provide a framework that makes equity possible in ways more common governance frameworks do not.
Examples of how sociocracy already supports equity
- Decisions by consent instead of by majority rules means no “minority” can be overpowered (I put “minority” in quotes because within the U.S. context, many white people call people of color “minorities” when in reality we’re in the global majority)
- A proposal process that starts with understanding and that ends with evaluating lowers the chances of people causing unintended harm
- Clear aims, domains, and roles makes power transparent and allows people to easily step into leadership roles, participate in decisions within domains that most impact them, and hold people accountable to agreed upon aims
- Organizations drawn to sociocracy, such as worker coops, ecovillages, and nonprofits, tend to be organizations that value shared power and social good
- Sociocracy’s entire ethos is to include all voices so this principle is already aligned with the practice of equity
What are strategies I can use to combine equity with sociocracy?
1. Understand your context
Understanding your context is understanding the circumstances surrounding the actions you take. Elements of context include but are not limited to:
- your own identity
- where you live
- who’s in your community
- what are your communities’ strengths and challenges
- what’s the history of your peoples and place
- who else is working on issues that connect with yours
You must be aware of context in order to accurately diagnose where inequity is systemic and how you can contribute to dismantling it.
My context is that I live in the United States of America, specifically New York City, the unceded territory of the Lenni Lenape, Canarsie, Shinecock, and Munsee peoples. Our city is incredibly diverse in race, culture, sectors, interests, et cetera. I work specifically in youth-led and intergenerational community organizing, where we’re youth leaders and adult allies working together to ensure that young people are equal participants or fully leading in all spaces where decisions about young people are made. I do this as an Asian American adult woman who experienced many of the inequities my communities’ young people have experienced, from racism to sexism to poverty, but who also has a lot of privilege as someone who is light-skinned, cisgender, and college educated.
Ways my context shapes my work towards equity include
- speaking less when I’m in intergenerational spaces
- speaking more when I’m in a majority-white space
- ensuring my organization’s circle role holders are representative of my city’s diversity
- checking my U.S.-centrism when in international spaces
What are elements of your context and how does that shape how you govern?
2. Be explicit about equity
We can only accomplish what we are explicit about. Naming equity as a goal allows your organization to move towards it. Naming inequity as an issue allows your organization to dismantle it.
Here are some places you can be explicit about equity
- Vision: envision a world that is equitable
- Aims: include promoting justice, equity, diversity and inclusion
- Meeting evaluations: reflect on how well equity was or was not practiced. For example, whose voices were missing or unacknowledged and whose voices were overpowering
- Performance reviews: give feedback on how a member is practicing equity as well as where they need to improve
Where do you need to be explicit about equity?
3. Center people most impacted by inequity
Centering people most impacted by inequity is recognizing that those closest to the problem know most about how to solve the problem. For example, a nonprofit dedicated to ending homelessness can only be effective with people who have and/or are experiencing homelessness making decisions.
Strategies to center people most impacted by inequity include
- requiring that all circles consider who’s most impacted by that circle’s aim and therefore need to be included within that circle’s membership.
- analyzing how experiences with your organization (like pay scales, satisfaction, and participation) may differ by class, gender, race, age, ability, et cetera. If you notice that men are having a more positive experience with your organization than women, for example, that’s something to explore further.
For more on this topic, check out Representation of those most impacted by decisions: Tools for when impact exceeds circle roles by Deborah Chang, Sofie Malm, Hanna Fischer.
Who’s most impacted by the decisions you make and how are those most impacted part of the decision-making process?
4. Make participation accessible
One reason people most impacted by inequity are often outside of decision making spaces is because barriers like less time or money make participation very difficult. Here are some common barriers and ideas for overcoming them.
Money
- Provide in-kind support like child care or transportation
- Advocate for societal policies that increase people’s economic well-being like higher wages or guaranteed healthcare
- Pay people
Time
- Serve food so that people are treated to a meal that they don’t need to spend time getting for themselves
- Call people for one-on-one interviews instead of expecting them to come to regular meetings
- Choose meeting dates and times thoughtfully (for example, meetings need to be after school hours to include students)
- Pay people
Ability
- Have sign language interpretation and closed captioning
- Describe images
- Use meeting spaces that have braille on signs, ramps for people with mobility challenges, and family friendly restrooms
- Have breaks
- Have people move around to refocus
- Increase readability of written material with large enough font sizes and dark text on non-white backgrounds
Communication Styles
- Include multiple modes of engagement from writing to art to oral storytelling
- Consider having individual thinking time, pair shares, and/or small group shares instead of going straight into rounds
- Share agendas ahead of time
What barriers exist for participation in your organization and how might you overcome them?
5. Learn and grow continuously
We are all participants in systems of oppression. Unlearning racism, sexism, classism, ableism, ageism… it’s a process that requires a commitment to continuous learning and growing. We will mess up. We will learn. We will teach.
Individually
- Build relationships and trust with people of different backgrounds because learning ultimately happens in community
- Understand that impact and intent are two different things, so acknowledge when you have caused harm, take responsibility for your actions, make amends, and commit to do better, regardless of your intent
- Learn the basics of anti-oppression from resources that already exist so that you’re not asking people from oppressed backgrounds to explain the basics to you on top of the work they already do
- Practice self-care because healing from trauma is exhausting work
Organizationally
- Invest in diversity, equity, and inclusion training
- Write publicly about the organization’s commitment to equity and the actions it’s taking to become more equitable
- Create accountability processes that enable people to address issues of interpersonal or institutional harm
- Set and evaluate progress towards equity related goals such as 100% percent of Black, indigenous, and/or people of color in the organization report that the organization values their voice and leadership
What is your plan for learning and growing?
Conclusion
To fulfill sociocracy’s promise that all voices matter, we must be intentional about making sure the voices of people who are most impacted by systems of oppression are heard. In our pursuit of a just world, it’s people who are closest to the problem who are closest to the solution.
About the Author
Deborah Chang (she/her) is founder of Youth Power Coalition, a non-profit that brings youth leaders and adult allies together to build a movement for youth-led collective impact. She is also a member of the Mission Circle and the Social Justice Helping Circle at Sociocracy for All. Outside of her day-to-day work, Deborah’s interests include rock climbing, education, entrepreneurship, and reconnecting with her Chinese heritage. If you want to tip her for her work, please send an amount that you consider fair to paypal.me/debryc. If you’re interested in connecting, email her at deborah.chang@sociocracyforall.org.
Originally published at SociocracyForAll.org
Featured image found here
PLEASE DONATE to help Network Weaver continue in it’s mission to offer free support and resources to networks worldwide.
Advancing the Environmental Literacy Movement: Connecting, Reinforcing, Aligning and Resourcing a Network-of-Networks
Environmental education is a powerful way to teach PK-12 students and change behaviors that impact our environment. It has been shown to positively influence students’ academic success, confidence, critical thinking, and civic responsibility, preparing them for this century’s challenges and opportunities. In support of a vision where all students graduate environmentally literate, Local Concepts conducted an assessment for the Chesapeake Bay Program Education Workgroup to determine the best way to strengthen the environmental literacy ecosystem of educators in the multi-state region of the Chesapeake Bay watershed.
The results of our assessment are enlightening. We learned that there is a lot of work happening within each state at multiple layers to advance environmental literacy and that a network-of-networks already exists among the environmental literacy movement. To illustrate this, we developed a conceptual model adapted from June Holley’s 2018 blog “Transformative Power of Networks of Networks”. The model also includes elements from the article “Transformative Networks are Multiscalar,” where Holley shares that “multiscalar networks, networks that cross levels or layers, have the capacity to turn innovation into widespread systemic transformation.” Currently, across the watershed, there are different “levels” of networks that support environmental education including: 1) local school district level, 2) state-wide level (e.g., organizations, agencies and network-like entities), and, 3) decision-maker level (those who influence policies and practices). Critical work is happening at each level, and through our assessment, we found that gaps exist both within each level and across levels (from school district to decision maker) in every state, effectively slowing the expansion and systemic integration of environmental education initiatives to date.
Connect, Reinforce, Align and Resource
Based on our assessment, we distilled a number of recommendations to connect, reinforce, align and resource a network-of-networks across the Chesapeake Bay watershed. Achieving the vision of all students graduating environmentally literate is a large scale, complex problem made even more complex because it is at the state level where standards of learning, graduation requirements, and other educational priorities are most often set and each state’s policies and standards of learning are different. Given this, our recommendations center individual states within the multi-state region and then explore how knowledge and resources at the school district and decision-maker levels can advance that vision as well as how regional efforts (e.g. the Chesapeake Bay Program) can continue to share and catalyze the work across states.
Using what we learned from the environmental education community and our experience with other networks, we recommend focusing first on strategically connecting and reinforcing the layer of the network-of-networks that will most effectively strengthen the rest of the system and bolster through lines for communication and information sharing. Specifically, this is the state level where a number of statewide formal education and non-formal environmental education network-like entities (e.g. state-specific Science Teacher Associations, Departments of Education, and Associations for Environmental Education) are doing great work, but are often not well-connected. We recommend intentionally bridging the existing formal and non-formal educator networks, agencies, and organizations that operate at the state level. The goal is to strengthen strategic ties, open information flows, and leverage resources to reach school districts and decision-makers together.
Once the state organizations and networks are better aligned, they can then identify and resource network weavers to scale the periphery to reach under-resourced communities, bring new school districts into the fold, and resource innovative approaches. A network weaver is an individual who is a strong communicator, sharer of information, and environmental education cheerleader; someone who wants to help build relationships and spread ideas. They are also good listeners, collecting important information about educator interests, challenges, and capacity building needs. Network weavers can then share the stories of school district innovators with the newly aligned state-level networks so that the approaches and lessons learned can be scaled out. We recommend that the state-level networks then take the school district innovations and success stories and develop effective messaging for network influencers to share with decision-makers to scale up the work to influence policies, practices, and resource allocation. A network influencer is someone who is capable of distributing strategic messaging and may have experienced the benefits of environmental curricula or an environmental education. Finally, another essential piece of this system that is not reflected in the conceptual model are the network catalysts, those that support the environmental literacy vision, believe in the power of networks to achieve the vision, and may fund the work. The Chesapeake Bay Program Education Workgroup is an important network catalyst. We recommend they continue to align and distribute resources, catalyze change through advisory support, build capacity by offering professional development, and share information across states in the region.
Want to learn more about our recommendations? Click here.
We are just beginning this journey to intentionally and strategically support a network-of-networks to advance a common vision without burdening folks with significantly more work or creating redundancies. We hope this will result in more diverse voices, leveraged resources, and knowledge-sharing to scale innovations and shift policies, practices, and mental models.
We will be asking ourselves:
“Where can we effectively strengthen ties to resource community-based environmental education and open meaningful and strategic communication pathways, so that the right-sized innovations and strategies can be shared back through the network to spread innovation and enhance student learning?
What has your experience been supporting a network-of-networks? What lessons learned do you have to share? We want to hear your stories and are happy to share ours. Please contact us anytime: Christy Gabbard, Christy@localconceptsllc.com; Sonia Keiner, Sonia@localconceptsllc.com. Local Concepts LLC works with networks and organizations to accelerate values-driven transformation.
A BIG thank you to NOAA, EPA, Chesapeake Bay Program, and the Chesapeake Bay Trust whose staff work tirelessly to improve conditions in the Chesapeake Bay watershed, and who serve as deep thinkers and advisors on this project!
Access the full Landscape Assessment: Informing the Development of a Regional Outdoor Learning Network HERE
Featured Image found HERE
PLEASE DONATE to help Network Weaver continue in it’s mission to offer free support and resources to networks worldwide.
Centering equity within networks
Collective Mind hosts regular Community Conversations with our global learning community. These sessions create space for network professionals to connect, share experiences, and cultivate solutions to common problems experienced by networks.
Our April 21, 2021, the Collective Mind Learning Community welcomed Ericka Stallings, Executive Director of Leadership Learning Community, to share her experiences, learnings, and challenges of working with networks to center and operationalize equity within their network practice. Leadership Learning Community is a national learning network that works to transform the way leadership development is understood, practiced, and evaluated in order to advance an equitable and just society, promoting leadership that is equity-based, networked, and collective. The session generated a conversation amongst participants around shared challenges, successes, and experiences based on their efforts to integrate equity within their networks.
Highlights from the conversation
The nature of network practice embodies the principle that a network’s strength is in its diversity. Finding equitable ways to harness that diversity is something most networks strive for. However, equity, both in definition and in practice, is as complex as networks themselves. As highlighted by our co-host’s presentation and through the community conversation, how networks choose to define equity, and how it is moved from concept, theory, and values to embodied and lived actions within a network can be dynamic, difficult, uncomfortable, rewarding, and necessary.
The conversation began with a definitionof equity, and an acknowledgment that it was only one of many ways to define equity. Part of that definition — “the guarantee of fair treatment, access, opportunity, and advancement while at the same time striving to identify and eliminate barriers that have prevented the full participation of some groups” — can, in part, be advanced through a network’s commitment to transparency and communication. However, as highlighted by our co-host’s experience, it should be done in a way that prioritizes people’s understanding and bi-directional communication, rather than overwhelming them with data, information, and updates. A perceived lack of transparency and communication by the network can damage trust and reduce participation, both of which are core to building an equity-centered network.
Another learning was the importance of centering and naming equity as a network value and goal and establishing a culture that centers equity. A network’s culture establishes values, norms, attitudes, and practices of the individuals’ and groups’ behaviors that influence their interactions. It maintains the network’s shared purpose and fosters ongoing collaboration, enabling these constructive dynamics and spaces and ensuring they are embodied in all network undertakings. A network culture centered on equity means shifting the network’s norms and dynamics to support and enable equity across its activities and then also asking if the outcomes achieved are in line with the values that were articulated.
Taking steps to move equity from something that is spoken to something that is operationalized can be uncomfortable, messy, and disruptive. However, much like the overall work of a network manager, it’s important to work with the discomfort, rather than against it. The process of operationalizing equity requires investing in relationships, deep listening, innovation, and experimentation. For example, participants described ways in which they had experimented with how to deepen network engagement such as holding space for formal and informal listening sessions, conducting surveys, creating affinity groups, incorporating consent-based decision-making, and integrating trust-based models. Core to this all is for the network to be willing to go through the process of experimentation and learning. In some cases, efforts may be met with failure, and in others, success. However, the ability of a network to create the space and invest in the efforts will ultimately foster trust in its network relationships, which is critical to its productivity and impact. Trust increases participation and collaboration, and it is only through collaboration that the network is able to achieve something greater than the sum of the parts.
How to authentically and meaningfully operationalize equity within a network parallels many aspects of what it means to be an effective network manager. It may look different for each network depending on its goals, breadth of diversity and composition, its mission, and many other factors. Networks, and a network’s culture, are dynamic, shifting constantly in the face of external and internal changes. Just as network managers and leaders must often accustom themselves to messiness, working with it instead of against it, operationalizing equity means disrupting and deconstructing systems and being open to conflict and discomfort. Having clear values and goals at the outset, and constantly questioning, learning, and assessing can help determine if and how a network’s efforts are progressing and if they are creating disruptive opportunities to increase equity. As mentioned by our co-host, if you’re feeling too comfortable, it may mean something has been missed.
Miss the session? View the recording here.
Thanks again to our co-host, Ericka Stallings from Leadership Learning Community!
Get involved
Have your own experiences with efforts to center equity in network practice? Tell us about it in the comments below.
Join us for the next Community Conversation!
Or email Seema at seema@collectivemindglobal.org to co-host an upcoming session with us. Learn more about co-hosting here.
Collective Mind seeks to build the efficiency, effectiveness, and impact of networks and the people who work for and with them. We believe that the way to solve the world’s most complex problems is through collective action – and that networks, in the ways that they organize people and organizations around a shared purpose, are the fit-for-purpose organizational model to harness resources, views, strengths, and assets to achieve that shared purpose.
Originally published HERE
PLEASE DONATE to help Network Weaver continue in it’s mission to offer free support and resources to networks worldwide.
The Wisdom of W.A.I.T.ing: Mindful Sharing in a Network Age
“We have two ears and one mouth, so we should listen more than we say.”
— Zeno of Citium
The other day I was reminded of the group working agreement “W.A.I.T.” (which stands for, “Why am I talking?”) as a guideline for people to be mindful of sharing air time in discussions. Since then I have been taking fresh note of my own inclinations and motives to not only talk in discussions, but also to share on social media. And as I have done this, I have also been more curious about what motivates others to share, verbally, in written and other forms. What are they thinking? Are they thinking about other people? If so, who? Have they thought through possible impacts? What do they care about?
I am a big fan of and subscriber to The Christian Science Monitor, which publishes a weekly digest of updates and perspectives on things happening around the globe, including (perhaps radical for these times) “bright spots” and “points of progress.” The editors and writers of Monitor articles also have a wonderful practice of publishing a little blurb for each offering under the heading “Why we wrote this.” How refreshing! What if all “news outlets” were to do this, or at least pause and ask this before writing and publishing/speaking?
And what if we were to do this in our different networks and communities? Might this help to break some of the spirals of othering and outrage (not to mention challenge the algorithms behind our growing social dilemma)? And shy of this, might the practice of W.A.I.T.ing or mindful and intentional sharing (viewed perhaps more generatively as “nourishing”) help people deliver on the promise of “network effects” to take communities and societies in a more prosocial direction?
I am currently working with two organizations over the course of 2021 to help staff and partners develop more networked ways of thinking and acting/being. Recently we had a discussion about how to keep the staff more up to date with respect to one another’s network weaving activities (connections made, crucial take-aways, immediate next steps) and also share other interesting content and connections. Trying to strike the right balance between radio silence and deluge, we started exploring how implementing the W.A.I.T/S. (Why am I talking/sharing?) prime might help. Along the way, a couple of people said that W.A.I.T/S. might also stand for “Why aren’t I talking/sharing?” and encourage the otherwise less inclined (for various reasons) to reconsider. This is stimulating rich conversation about how to tend and modulate important flows in various systems (organizational, community, school, etc.) to support learning, resilience, alignment, equity, emergence, coordinated action …
All this to say, whatever our goal(s) may be, it could be important to … W.A.I.T for it. This is how less conscious and helpful sharing (and silence) might become a practice of care-full curation (making thoughtful offers to and requests – sharing and caring can also include asking questions! – of one’s communities).
originally published at Innovation Interaction for Social Change
featured image found here
Curtis Ogden is a Senior Associate at the Interaction Institute for Social Change (IISC). Much of his work entails consulting with multi-stakeholder networks to strengthen and transform food, education, public health, and economic systems at local, state, regional, and national levels. He has worked with networks to launch and evolve through various stages of development.
PLEASE DONATE to help Network Weaver continue in it’s mission to offer free support and resources to networks worldwide.
Building Community Food Webs
Ken Meter’s book, Building Community Food Webs. was released by Island Press on April 29. The book highlights the importance of community network-building as a core part of building community-based food systems, and shows that building mutual trust over decades is critical to success. Chapter 6 features Appalachian Center for Economic Network’s (ACEnet) persistent work, listening closely to what residents with limited wealth felt they needed, and designing tailor-made solutions that helped them accomplish their goals. As broader networks engaged more and more civic leaders in the Athens, OH and Nelsonville, OH area, this grew into lasting support for economic development that was focused on those who needed it the most.
The book also profiles 7 other community foods initiatives in Montana, Hawaii’i, Tucson, Northeast Indiana, Phoenix, Brighton CO, and Dakota County, Minnesota. These are carefully selected from Ken’s work in 144 regions in 41 states over the past two decades. Each one highlights efforts of special inspiration, or special resistance, to community-based foods efforts.
Building Community Food Webs also offers the first published analysis of the extractive nature of the US food system — with special focus on the fact that the commodity system has drained more than $4 trillion away from the US farm sector — a sector that is worth only $3 trillion in total assets today.
In the concluding chapters, the book also features Ken’s summary of the key issues that community foods initiatives need to get right in order to be most effective.
Further information about the book can be found at: https://islandpress.org/books/building-community-food-webs
featured image found HERE
Ken Meter is one of the most experienced food system analysts in the U.S., integrating market analysis, business development, systems thinking, and social concerns. Meter holds 50 years of experience in inner-city and rural community capacity building. His local economic analyses have promoted local food networks in 143 regions in 41 states, two provinces, and four tribal nations. He was commissioned to create statewide food system assessments for New Hampshire, Hawai’i, Alaska, Mississippi, South Carolina, Indiana, Ohio, and Minnesota, and developed strategic regional food plans for 16 regional food systems. Meter consulted with the USDA Agricultural Marketing Service and Colorado State University as one of 14 co-authors of a toolkit for measuring economic impacts of local food development. He is co-editor of Sustainable Food System Assessment: Lessons from Global Practice (Routledge ,UK) in 2019. Meter’s work can be found at www.crcworks.org
PLEASE DONATE to help Network Weaver continue in it’s mission to offer free support and resources to networks worldwide.
Collaborative Funding for a Just Transition
Several months ago I was interviewed by Leslie Meehan and Ben Roberts of Now What?! The topic was Collaborative Funding for a Just Transition and we explored innovative strategies to generate needed financial resources for networks. Some of the topics we discussed were:
- New ways that networks can think about money that help them move out of individualistic approaches to fundraising to network approaches to money and resource generation.[ap_spacing spacing_height="10px"]
- How networks can lessen the need for external funding by encouraging network participants to meet each other's needs. For example to mentor each other more rather than relying on paid consultants and to work more collaboratively (for example, aggregating orders to get much lower costs for supplies).[ap_spacing spacing_height="10px"]
- How networks can set up income generating activities to support their work.[ap_spacing spacing_height="10px"]
- How to make grants collaborative so that many network partners can access new resource flows.[ap_spacing spacing_height="10px"]
- How putting grant funds into Innovation Funds (where decisions about the funds are made participatively) creates more democratic structures to control the flow of funding.[ap_spacing spacing_height="10px"]
- Building massive social media and communications networks and using those for fundraising.[ap_spacing spacing_height="10px"]
- What innovations have you been part of that explore network approaches to resource generation? How might you apply some of the ideas presented in this video?
featured image found HERE
June Holley has been weaving networks, helping others weave networks and writing about networks for over 40 years. She is currently increasing her capacity to capture learning and innovations from the field and sharing what she discovers through blog posts, occasional virtual sessions and a forthcoming book.
PLEASE DONATE to help Network Weaver continue in it’s mission to offer free support and resources to networks worldwide.
A Network of Support for Racial Equity Leaders
Working to advance racial equity in systems and organizations is challenging and often isolating work. REASN - the Racial Equity Action Support Network - is a network in Minneapolis St. Paul that brings together Minnesota’s racial equity leaders and practitioners, the people whose job it is to design, facilitate and lead the efforts that enable community, nonprofit, and government organizations to advance equity. At REASN, these equity change agents find a space that provides:
- Support for doing the challenging, and often isolating work of creating racial equity
- Action strategies that are more powerful and effective as they are rooted in shared analysis and reflection
While there are many spaces that provide education and skill-building for those who are committed to racial equity, REASN is unique in offering a space for those who are responsible for leading those education, skill-building and systems change efforts. It provides a space of respite, learning and growth for those who are often in the position of hosting and supporting others.
In 2020, REASN could see transition on the horizon as funding and structural changes were underway in the organization that had served as its fiscal host. The network decided it was the opportune moment to invest in an evaluation that would document REASN’s impact over its 6 year history. Network members wanted to be able to tell the story of REASN to those who might support its sustainability. We chose ripple effect mapping as the evaluation tool to support us.
Ripple Effect Mapping
REASN hired a team of facilitators from Wilder Research to lead us through the Ripple Effect Mapping process. Network members worked alongside this team to create the purpose and questions that would guide the process.
Here’s how our evaluation partners at Wilder Research describe the process: Ripple Effect Mapping (REM) is an evaluation tool used to better understand the intended and unintended impacts of a project. It is particularly helpful when evaluating complex initiatives that both influence, and are impacted by, the community. REM is a facilitated discussion with staff and local stakeholders that creates a visual “mind map” during the discussion that shows the linkages between program activities and resulting changes in the community. This approach is intended to help demonstrate the project’s impacts more holistically and to describe the degree to which different types of impacts are observed by project staff and community stakeholders.
Ripple Effect Mapping appealed to us both because we felt it would capture the impact of our network, and because we thought it would expose our members to a new tool they could use in other parts of their work.
REASN Ripple Effect Mapping Process
REASN has about 40-50 actively engaged members in our network and double that number more loosely connected to our work. As we thought about who to include in our REM sessions, we set out to invite people with a range of participation levels in REASN; some who had been a part of the network since its creation and others who were more recent participants. We also wanted to engage a group that represented the diverse lived experiences of our network members. We ended up with a group of fourteen people who represented a variety of professions, races, ages, and gender-identities.
During the REM discussions, participants from REASN gathered to reflect on the impacts of their time in the network. We did our best to make the process transparent so that members could learn about REM while doing it. The questions asked during the REM discussions focused on participants’ personal and professional growth, how REASN supports their racial equity work, and observations about outcomes of their work. Here are some examples of the questions we used:
- What is one important change that you’ve seen or that you’ve experienced personally that has come out of the work of REASN?
- What new or deepened connections have you made with others as a result of REASN?
- How has REASN helped you disrupt the myths of white supremacy and colonization?
- How has REASN sharpened your thinking about advancing racial equity?
- What have you gained from the relationships you’ve developed in REASN?
As we answered these questions, we placed our post-its on the wall, pairs shared out from their conversations and our evaluation partners took thorough notes capturing the impacts we were naming. The process felt very organic and not unlike a discussion we would have at one of our quarterly network gatherings.
The observed impacts were grouped into five main types of changes that had taken place because of participating in REASN:
- Building courage and confidence
- Fostering new ways of thinking
- Building a healing space
- Fostering connections and support
- Impacting how people are as practitioners
A Season of Transition
As we thought might be the case, REASN in now in a period of transition as we explore possibilities for a new fiscal partner and funding sources. Our Ripple Effect Map is serving as a key asset in this process, reminding us of the impact of our network and why it’s worth the work to sustain it and helping us tell the story of our work to potential partners and funders.
featured image found HERE
The Racial Equity Action Support Network (REASN) brings together racial equity champions and advocates from community, nonprofit, and government organizations across Minnesota. Sindy Morales Garcia and Kirsten Johnson of Courageous Change Collective serve as network guardians for REASN.
PLEASE DONATE to help Network Weaver continue in it’s mission to offer free support and resources to networks worldwide.